Author: pusatstudiantroposen@gmail.com

  • Reading Group – Week 3 | Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature (1953/2001)

    Throughout 2026, we will convene an intensive reading group dedicated to revisiting the thought of one of the most influential philosophers within the broader horizon of geophilosophy, Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze’s intellectual project unfolds across a remarkably wide terrain, engaging with philosophy, politics, art, law, technology, and science.

    Reading Materials:
    Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature

    • Six: Principles of Human Nature (pp. 105-122)
    • Conclusion: Purposiveness (pp. 123-134)
  • Reading Group – Week 2 | Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature (1953/2001)

    Throughout 2026, we will convene an intensive reading group dedicated to revisiting the thought of one of the most influential philosophers within the broader horizon of geophilosophy, Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze’s intellectual project unfolds across a remarkably wide terrain, engaging with philosophy, politics, art, law, technology, and science.

    Reading Materials:
    Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature

    • Three: The Power of the Imagination in Ethics and Knowledge (pp. 55-72)
    • Four: God and the World (pp. 73-84)
    • Five: Empiricism and Subjectivity (pp. 85-104)
  • Reading Group – Week 1 | Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature (1953/2001)

    Throughout 2026, we will convene an intensive reading group dedicated to revisiting the thought of one of the most influential philosophers within the broader horizon of geophilosophy, Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze’s intellectual project unfolds across a remarkably wide terrain, engaging with philosophy, politics, art, law, technology, and science.

    Reading Materials:
    Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature

    • Translator’s Introduction: Deleuze, Empiricism, and Struggle for Subjectivity (pp. 1-20)
    • One: The Problem of Knowledge and the Problem of Ethics (pp. 20-36)
    • Two: Cultural World and General Rules (pp. 37-54)
  • Vigo Joshua Pangaribuan

    2 November 2002  —  19 April 2026

    “His spirit gave everything a deeper meaning.”

    It is with profound grief and a heart full of gratitude that we announce the passing of Vigo Joshua Pangaribuan, who left this world far too soon on the 19th of April, 2026, at the age of twenty-three, following a sudden cardiac arrest. Vigo was not merely a young scholar — he was a presence: restless, searching, generous, and alive with the kind of intellectual curiosity that makes those around it feel more awake.

    Vigo was a participant and non-permanent member of the Centre for Anthropocene Studies and Geophilosophy (CAS-GEO), where he contributed not only his ideas but his entire sensibility — a rare quality in someone so young. He had a gift for seeing connections between the world as it is lived and the world as it is theorised, and he brought both dimensions into everything he touched.

    · · ·

    Among Vigo’s most meaningful contributions was his role in the publication of a journal article on waste, Piyungan, and the city of Yogyakarta, appearing in Environmental Sociology. His insights — drawn from lived fieldwork on waste banks in the region — gave the research a grounding that no library alone could have provided. He understood, perhaps instinctively, that knowledge must be accountable to place and to people. His experience walking through the realities of urban waste management offered the Centre a clarity of vision that became woven permanently into that work.

    Beyond the published page, Vigo was a sustaining presence in the broader development of CAS-GEO. He did not merely observe — he challenged, encouraged, and quietly insisted that the Centre live up to its own ambitions. His care for the institution was inseparable from his care for ideas.

    Pillars of his intellectual legacy

    A developing critique of pedagogy in the Indonesian context

    A commitment to the decolonisation of knowledge

    Eco-political thought and practice in Indonesia

    These were not abstract interests. They were the convictions of a person who believed that thinking matters — that where ideas come from, and whose experiences they carry, shapes what is possible in the world. Vigo lived these questions. He brought them to conversations, to arguments, to silences, and to the kind of sustained attention that is the foundation of all genuine scholarship.

    · · ·

    We will remember Vigo as more than a collaborator, more than a young scholar at the beginning of his road.

    We will remember the way he made the work feel urgent and the questions feel alive.

    His spirit gave this Centre something it will not easily name, and cannot replace.

    He is gone too soon — but nothing he gave us is gone.

  • Public Lecture : From Invisibility to Recognition

    This public lecture explores the vital transition of Indigenous epistemologies from global invisibility to scholarly recognition. Examines how intercultural hermeneutics can validate Indigenous perspectives as original and non-derivative knowledge, offering a critical yet respectful framework for global engagement without compromising their unique cultural essence.

    Tuesday, 30 September 2025

    Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada

    Speakers:

    • Prof. Prasenjit Biswas

    (Professor of Philosophy, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India)

    • Rangga Kala Mahaswa, M.Phil

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia)

    • Min Seong Kim, Ph.D.

    (Cultural Studies, Sanata Dharma University, Indonesia)

    Moderator:

    Redira Ken Atika

  • Gilles Deleuze Reading Group

    Throughout 2026, we will convene an intensive reading group dedicated to revisiting the thought of one of the most influential philosophers within the broader horizon of geophilosophy, Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze’s intellectual project unfolds across a remarkably wide terrain, engaging with philosophy, politics, art, law, technology, and science. We believe that this rereading initiative provides an opportunity to critically reassess Deleuze’s well-established ideas, including those that have shaped influential traditions of thought, while also bringing renewed attention to the more subtle and potentially underexamined aspects of his works. In doing so, the program aims to position Deleuzian thought as a compelling alternative framework for engaging with contemporary academic challenges and climates.

    The program will examine each of Deleuze’s major works, including those written in collaboration with Félix Guattari. Nevertheless, the discussion will not encompass writings prior to 1953 that are generally regarded as non-canonical, consisting:

    • Description de la femme: Pour une philosophic d’Autrui sexuee ‘Description of the woman: For a philosophy of the sexual Other’ (1945)
    • Du Christ à la bourgeoise ‘From Christ to the bourgeois’ (1946)
    • Mathese, Science et Philosophie ‘Mathematics, Science and Philosophy’ (1946)
    • Dires et profils ‘Sayings and profiles’ (1946)
    • Introduction to Denis Diderot (1947)
    • David Hume, sa vie, son oeuvre, avec un exposé de sa philosophie ‘David Hume, his life, his work, with an exposition of his philosophy’ (1952)

    Posthumously published collections of essays, e.g. Desert Islands and Other Texts 1953–1974 (2004) and Two Regimes of Madness: Texts and Interviews 1975–1995 (2006), are not treated as the primary focus of the sessions. Instead, these texts serve as complementary materials alongside relevant secondary literature and commentary. Likewise, collections of interviews, e.g. Dialogues (1977) and Dialogues II (1987), function as supporting references rather than as central readings within the program.

    All sessions will be conducted online and each meeting led by a designated speaker. Participants are expected to complete the assigned readings in advance to enable focused discussion. The sequence of readings follows Deleuze’s bibliographical trajectory, with each month dedicated to a different major work. For further information and meeting link, please contact us at organizers@cas-geo.org.

    ___________________________________________

    April 2026 – Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature (Columbia University Press, 2001)

    Experience is a principle, which instructs me in the several conjunctions of objects for the past. Habit is another principle, which determines me to expect the same for the future, and both of them conspire to operate upon the imagination.

    — David Hume, in A Treatise of Human Nature, p. 55

    Nature and culture form, therefore, a whole or a composite. Hume repudiates the arguments which assign everything, including justice, to the instinct, and the arguments which assign everything, including the meaning of virtue, to politics and education. The former, as they forget culture, give us a false image of nature; the latter, as they forget nature, deform culture.

    — Gilles Deleuze, in Empiricism and Subjectivity, p. 44

    This work presents a bold reinterpretation of David Hume by arguing that empiricism is not simply a theory of knowledge grounded in sensory experience, but a philosophy explaining how subjectivity itself is produced. Drawing on A Treatise of Human Nature, Deleuze contends that the subject is not a pre-given unity but an effect emerging from associations of impressions, habits, and passions. Through principles of association and the formation of habit, fragmented experiences become organized into stable beliefs, expectations, and moral practices. In this sense, Humean empiricism reveals that the self, knowledge, and social order arise from processes within experience itself, positioning subjectivity as a dynamic and constructed product of relations rather than a foundational origin of thought.

    Week 1

    Convenor: Rangga Kala Mahaswa

    Date and Time: Apr. 14, 2026 | 8 p.m. (GMT +7) or 2 p.m. (GMT +0)

    Reading Materials:

    • Translator’s Introduction: Deleuze, Empiricism, and Struggle for Subjectivity (pp. 1-20)
    • One: The Problem of Knowledge and the Problem of Ethics (pp. 20-36)
    • Two: Cultural World and General Rules (pp. 37-54)

    Week 2

    Convenor: Albertus Arioseto Bagas Pangestu

    Date and Time: Apr. 21, 2026 | 8 p.m. (GMT +7) or 2 p.m. (GMT +0)

    Reading Materials:

    • Three: The Power of the Imagination in Ethics and Knowledge (pp. 55-72)
    • Four: God and the World (pp. 73-84)
    • Five: Empiricism and Subjectivity (pp. 85-104)

    Week 3

    Convenor: Gloria Bayu Nusa Prayuda

    Date and Time: Apr. 28, 2026 | 8 p.m. (GMT +7) or 2 p.m. (GMT +0)

    Reading Materials:

    • Six: Principles of Human Nature (pp. 105-122)
    • Conclusion: Purposiveness (pp. 123-134)

    Additional Readings

    Deleuze’s Fragmented Writings:

    • “Hume” (in Desert Islands and Other Texts 1953–1974, Semiotext(e), 2004, pp. 162-169)
    • “On Empiricism” (in Dialogues II, Columbia University Press, 2007, pp. 54-59)
    • “Chapter 2: Repetition for Itself” (in Difference and Repetition, Bloomsbury, 2014, pp.  93-170)

    Commentaries:

    • M. R. M. Parrott, Empiricism and Subjectivity: Deleuze and Consciousness, Rimric Press, 2002
    • John Roffe, “David Hume”, in Deleuze’s Philosophical Lineage, Edinburgh University Press, 2005, pp. 67-86
    • Jeffrey A. Bell, Deleuze’s Hume: Philosophy, Culture and the Scottish Enlightenment, Edinburgh University Press, 2009
    • Russell Ford, Experience and Empiricism: Hegel, Hume, and the Early Deleuze, Northwestern University Press, 2022
    • Russell Ford, “A Kind of Science-Fiction: Deleuze and Hume”, in The Deleuzian Mind, Routledge, 2025, pp. 51-64